The environmental problems that today’s world is facing are so great that there is little ordinary people can do to improve the situation. So governments and large organizations should be responsible for reducing the amount of damage being done to the environment. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Globally, the natural world issues have surged, and possibilities to shrink the calamities was poured on the political administrators. From my point of view, I disagree with the statement. This essay will discuss both possibilities and sum up with a solution.
To begin with, the environmental issues are rocketed to a critical state that it’s every individual responsibility to be concerned with the consequences of the use of articles that are harmful to nature. The articles we consume in daily life account for mother earth’s health. For instance, the electronic gadgets or accessories we use and throw are dumped. A very few amounts of them are recycled. The rest are left on the planet, which is non-biodegradable. Therefore the production of such gadgets yields a highly toxic waste. There are also other products too which are toxic to the environment, such as plastic, mercury gasses, industrial growth and deforestation.
To navigate, The political officials are not only the initiators to control but also the public. The public must decline the use of non-biodegradable products. According to a survey conducted by an international university, there are more than 50% of non-biodegradable products consumed worldwide annually. Therefore the supervisors of industries or CEO’s of companies must take care at the time of production up to which extent does an object is disposable.
To sum up, I consider the political authorities and global treaties must sign a protocol to diminish the products that are non-biodegradable. The public must also play a major role to ban the purchase of such products.
Follow Us on Facebook