Some people say it is more important to plant trees in the open spaces in towns and cities than build more housing. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
When it comes to the environment, it has been observed that people should plant more trees in Metropolitan and vacant places of the society instead of construction of Residence. I differ from the above-mentioned statement to a large extent. Both the experts are elaborated on in the ensuing paragraphs.
Out of all the arguments, the foremost one is that it can create a housing shortage in the foreseeable future. In other words, the majority of the people migrate from rural areas to urban areas because of government facilities—for instance, better education, adequate road infrastructure, convenient public transportation and good health care facility.
Furthermore, another reason is that the construction of the buildings produces employment for labours. To reformulate, they have insufficient knowledge about other fields, so that these types of works are the primary requirement for them. To illustrate, Harvard University research reveals that in India, many people are just dependent on daily income.
However, I would not overlook the dark inside. The primary reason is that in the present time pollution is the main concern for every country. Planting trees not only reduce global warming but also is the main source of oxygen. Consequently, people should plant trees individually outside of their residence in the city area.
To recapitulate, it can be finally commented that flora plays an essential role in the atmosphere. However, my arguments prove that there is a lack of dwelling places in the urban areas as well as the main source of work for labour.
Follow Us on Facebook