Some People say you should always marry for love; others say that in an uncertain world it is wiser to marry for money. Discuss both points of view and give your own opinion.
Sample Answer of Some Say You Should Always Marry for Love
In the 21st century, where the world is being on a wild goose chase, martial relationships have seen a side of transformation. Half of society possesses the instincts that love is mandatory for a long-lasting relationship. However, the other half opines, due to the predominant prevalence of uncertainty, the financial background has to be taken into account to get married. Given the above statements, My opinions along with supportive examples are being elucidated below.
In the pre-urban era, the legal joining of two people was based on the ideology of adjustments. For instance, the alliance making would occur on a semi-formal basis. Consequently, couples used to tie the knot. Irrespective of their misunderstanding, people used to stay intact. This concept personified that love is universal and keeps people co-joined. Hence people eventually believed that if an attachment will be based on affection and not on infatuation the marriage life would be a bed of roses.
On the contrary, in the modernized era, owing to the gradual increase of awareness, match-making remodeled into an asset hunt. To quote, people who wanted to get married firstly, pondered about future security, which can be established through sufficient funds. For example, nowadays, because of the alarmingly rising divorce rate, people started to think that money overweighs love if survival has to go uninterrupted.
In the final analysis, I would like to conclude by clarifying that, although affection is imperative in a bond, wealth also withholds a pivotal role. An amalgamation of money with care would be a platform for a perfect marriage.