Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people. Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages, while others believe that would be a waste of money. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
It goes without saying that language is considered a prominent segment of human life. There are numerous Vernacular near defunct, while a small chunk of people is likely to use these languages in their lifestyle. Some believe that higher authorities should preserve these speeches with public funding for survival. In sharp contrast, some people tend to believe that, It could be a waste of money. However, in this essay, I intend to delve into both arguments before forming an opinion.
According to the first school of thought, dialects placed great emphasis on individual freedom. A majority of people believe that the regimes must preserve the extinction of minority languages. Put in other words, every country has specific traditional speech which people follow from their PastPast and transfer to many generations to appropriately keep the alive importance of those languages. For instance, there are 7111 languages spoken in the world wild and also get famous from their native speech, but this number is constantly fluctuating, and this does not include dialects either; this leads to many countries will lose their precious cultures and goes to extinct soon, as a result, whole the world will suffer from drastic consequences and unable to identify the exact value of history. To add to it, the government needs to take some wealthy actions to keep alive all the speeches and save for the upcoming generation.
However, the opposite camp also has some solid grounds to defend its point of view and believes that spending a handsome amount of funds for preserving the languages is a full waste of money. According to them, the total cost of funds converses the dialects are consumed a massive amount of funds so, and it could be a direct impact on the country’s infrastructure. As a result, people would suffer. In other words, there are a few sections of people who use minor speech, and funds will not be initiated for a small number. For example, there are a few nations already suffering from an economic crisis; if they utilize their funds for language, thus leads residents would deprive numerous of amenities which countries are unable to fulfil. In addition, other sectors are Too crucial for every country like education, transport and other sort of staple needs. Government need to look out there matters before investing their money in the language department.
To put it in a nutshell, I pen down saying that there is a good argument for and against saving the languages. Personally, those languages are near to extension authorities must be implemented possible funding to save the traditional languages and people also take the initiative should protect these languages with their efforts.
Follow Us on Facebook